The introduction of Video Assistant Referee (VAR) technology was hailed as a revolutionary step forward in ensuring fair play in football by eradicating human errors during matches. Nevertheless, recent data from the Scottish FA Referee Operations presents a nuanced narrative on its efficacy. These statistics have ignited deep-seated apprehensions regarding the current impact of this technology on the sport.

Of particular concern is the revelation that errors in VAR decisions have doubled since the last assessment, a troubling trend for clubs like Celtic, where each match holds paramount importance. The ramifications of these mistakes can be substantial.

Adding to the discontent is the lack of transparency surrounding the VAR review process. Incidents triggering reviews are veiled in secrecy, causing a lack of trust and comprehension among the Scottish football community.

This discontent resonates throughout Europe, with fans expressing growing dissatisfaction. The lofty promises of technology enhancing the game appear hollow when juxtaposed with the reality of inconsistent and bewildering VAR judgments. Every contentious decision further strengthens the notion that VAR is not just imperfect but incompatible with the dynamic and swift nature of football.

For many, the charm of football lies in its continuous flow and human touch—elements that VAR was intended to honor, not disrupt.

It is imperative for the Scottish FA and international football regulatory bodies to take these criticisms seriously. Efforts must focus not only on refining the technology but also on improving its communication and application.

The rushed implementation of VAR in Scotland was driven by a desire to ensure the eligibility of their referees for international competitions, yet no Scottish officials will feature in the upcoming Euros this summer.

Is it time to reevaluate VAR and its implementation, or will football’s governing bodies continue to press forward despite mounting concerns?